<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantastic response to Ten Years On &#8211; more copies now available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torquil Dick-Erikson</title>
		<link>http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Torquil Dick-Erikson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greateudebate.com/?p=98#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Colin Walshaw is right. Reading the book it is clear that the only solution is to leave the EU. 
But the book points the reader towards voting for Cameron, who. the author says, will make a vigorous attempt to renegotiate our membership, and if that fails he will take us out. 
This is a dangerous illusion. 
Cameron is hand in glove with the Heselclarke EU-fanatics. 
The book&#039;s author makes NO mention of UKIP, except on page 89 to say that since the Tories took over and enacted UKIP&#039;s main policy by leaving, Nigel Farage announced that UKIP was winding up. 
Yet the only soution is to vote UKIP, for UKIP is the only party that will implement the policy recommended by the author. 
So, EITHER UKIP wins enough seats to form a withdrawalist majority (maybe with rebel MPs from other parties, though Cameron has ensured that only orthodox candidates may stand for the Tories).
OR if a LibLabCon governing majority of quislings is formed to last the full 5-year term, the EU will transform Britain so much that no future elections that we would call free and fair will ever be held again.
It is a pity that the book misses this main point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin Walshaw is right. Reading the book it is clear that the only solution is to leave the EU.<br />
But the book points the reader towards voting for Cameron, who. the author says, will make a vigorous attempt to renegotiate our membership, and if that fails he will take us out.<br />
This is a dangerous illusion.<br />
Cameron is hand in glove with the Heselclarke EU-fanatics.<br />
The book&#8217;s author makes NO mention of UKIP, except on page 89 to say that since the Tories took over and enacted UKIP&#8217;s main policy by leaving, Nigel Farage announced that UKIP was winding up.<br />
Yet the only soution is to vote UKIP, for UKIP is the only party that will implement the policy recommended by the author.<br />
So, EITHER UKIP wins enough seats to form a withdrawalist majority (maybe with rebel MPs from other parties, though Cameron has ensured that only orthodox candidates may stand for the Tories).<br />
OR if a LibLabCon governing majority of quislings is formed to last the full 5-year term, the EU will transform Britain so much that no future elections that we would call free and fair will ever be held again.<br />
It is a pity that the book misses this main point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Walshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Walshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greateudebate.com/?p=98#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Great reason to either have a referendum to stay/leave or if not join UKIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reason to either have a referendum to stay/leave or if not join UKIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff H</title>
		<link>http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greateudebate.com/?p=98#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Nice to see the figures in easy to understand English.

I just hope Mr Cameron is re-reading this and formulating plans.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the figures in easy to understand English.</p>
<p>I just hope Mr Cameron is re-reading this and formulating plans&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Ludlow</title>
		<link>http://www.greateudebate.com/2009/fantastic-response-to-ten-years-on-more-copies-now-available/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Ludlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greateudebate.com/?p=98#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Just read the book, frightening to know just how much it has cost us over the years. Has this country got a bottomless pit as far as money is concerned? You would certainly think so. Was VAT introduced to pay for it? I can&#039;t recall. If so then look to the possibility of hign street prices coming down if we were not to be charget the VAT. That would be just ONE saving if we were to leave the EU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the book, frightening to know just how much it has cost us over the years. Has this country got a bottomless pit as far as money is concerned? You would certainly think so. Was VAT introduced to pay for it? I can&#8217;t recall. If so then look to the possibility of hign street prices coming down if we were not to be charget the VAT. That would be just ONE saving if we were to leave the EU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

